Promo codes, and what each one actually gives you

You will not find a bonus, a deposit match or free credit behind any of the 5 referrals here, because not one platform documents one. 3 of them state a benefit their own documents confirm, 2 do not, and what you pay to open moves more money than any of them.

every referral arrangement, and which ones are confirmed

MarketMoves earns a commission when a reader opens an account through a link on this page. It costs the reader nothing and does not change the figures shown. Platform registry 2026-08-28a, reviewed through 2026-11-28. Every cost here is an opening cost, and 3 of the 5 platforms publish no rate for holding, so none of these figures contains the cost of holding a position open.

the terms no referral will change for you

A referral moves at most one line of a fee schedule, and the 5 platforms set your ceiling, your loss cap and what you are charged to hold identically whether your account arrived through a referral or not. Read those columns before the code column, because they are the ones that decide your outcome.

the best discount here gives you $0.02 back on one opening

Hyperliquid runs the only percentage discount on an opening fee across the 5 platforms, 4 per cent off a rate of 0.045% of notional, which works out at 0.0018% of the exposure you open. On a $100 stake at 10x it takes what you pay from $0.45 to $0.43, so you keep $0.02, carried to four decimal places here because two would round it away entirely.

Now weigh that against where you open. Opening cost at 10x across the platforms pricing that leverage level spans $0.88, which is 49 times the discount, and the two fee bases cross at 23.1x taker and 69.4x maker, past which a rate on notional costs you more than a flat rate on the stake. Weigh it against how hard you push and the gap widens again, because a stake lost at a leverage level the excursion data does not support costs you $100, or 5,556 times that same discount.

what 2 of the 5 arrangements have not confirmed

Ostium, Moon between them give you no figure you could check for your side of the arrangement. Where a platform describes something without publishing the numbers behind it you get the description labelled as the platform's own claim, and where a platform publishes nothing you are told nothing. Each detail page names which term is unconfirmed, then tells you which terms hold regardless.

1 of the 5 have a dated commercial record behind the code

Moon carries a dated record covering the terms a code page is really asked about: whether a welcome bonus exists, whether fees come back to you as rakeback, how many other codes are published for the same platform, where the VIP ladder starts, how you fund the account and what nobody publishes at all. Each of those terms is labelled on the detail page with whether the platform documents it, an affiliate page reported it, or nobody publishes it.

The other 4 platforms have no such record here yet, so their pages carry the fee schedule, the ceiling and the loss cap and stop there. That is a gap in coverage rather than a judgement about the platforms, and until the record exists you are better served by the review page for each one than by anything a promo-code page could claim.

Platform registry 2026-08-28a, reviewed through 2026-11-28. Every figure below is computed from each platform's own published terms.

Figures on this page were rebuilt 2026-09-16 by the MarketMoves editorial desk, from the sources named in the methodology. Nothing here is a forecast, and none of it is advice.