Platform comparison
Five platforms, three fee bases, one ceiling of 1000x. Where each one actually lists the market you want is the deciding line. Across 5 platforms the ceilings run from 40x to 1000x, and the flat and notional fee bases cross at 23.1x.
Of the 5 platforms compared here, the first split between them is the fee base. Moon charges 1.0% of the stake, so its opening cost is flat in the multiplier, and the other 4 charge a rate on notional, so their opening cost rises with it. Solving one base against the other puts the crossover at 23.1x on taker rates and 69.4x on maker rates, and the stake cancels out of that solution, so the crossover holds at any size.
The second split is what each platform publishes at all. 2 of 5 publish a carry rate or a cap on one, 1 of 5 publish a ceiling per instrument rather than per asset class, and ceilings run from 40x to 1000x. Where a figure is unpublished the cell says so outright. If you are planning a hold over days you need to know the carry rate is unavailable rather than assume it is small.
Open Moon with codeMARKETevery dimension across 5 platforms, stated once
| Platform | 2x | 3x | 5x | 10x | 20x | 25x | 40x | 50x | 100x | 200x | 500x | 1000x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moon | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Hyperliquid | $0.09 | $0.13 | $0.22 | $0.43 | $0.86 | $1.08 | $1.73 | not listed ceiling 40x | not listed ceiling 40x | not listed ceiling 40x | not listed ceiling 40x | not listed ceiling 40x |
| Ostium | $0.06 to $0.20 | $0.09 to $0.30 | $0.15 to $0.50 | $0.30 to $1.00 | $0.60 to $2.00 | $0.75 to $2.50 | $1.20 to $4.00 | $1.50 to $5.00 | $3.00 to $10.00 | $6.00 to $20.00 | not listed ceiling 200x | not listed ceiling 200x |
| Gains Network (gTrade) | $0.02 to $0.12 | $0.04 to $0.18 | $0.06 to $0.30 | $0.12 to $0.60 | $0.24 to $1.20 | $0.30 to $1.50 | $0.48 to $2.40 | $0.60 to $3.00 | $1.20 to $6.00 | $2.40 to $12.00 | $6.00 to $30.00 | $12.00 to $60.00 |
| Avantis | $0.09 | $0.14 | $0.23 | $0.45 | $0.90 | $1.12 | $1.80 | $2.25 | $4.50 | $9.00 | $22.50 | not listed ceiling 500x |
Opening cost on a $100 stake at every leverage level any platform publishes. A leverage level above a platform's ceiling shows the ceiling rather than a blank, and a platform whose rate varies by asset class shows both ends of its own schedule.
| Dimension | Moon | Hyperliquid | Ostium | Gains Network (gTrade) | Avantis | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markets recorded, of 45 tracked | asset classes only | 17 of 45 tracked | 75 on its own instrument list | asset classes only | asset classes only | a per-instrument record exists for 1 of the 5 platforms; the rest publish class lists |
| Fee basis | wager | notional | notional | notional | notional | 1 charges on the stake, 4 charge on notional |
| Charged on | when you open, with no closing charge documented either way | when you open, with no closing charge documented either way | when you open and nothing when you close | when you open and the same again when you close | when you open and the same again when you close | a round trip doubles any rate charged on both sides |
| Opening rate | 1.0% | 0.045% | 0.03% to 0.1% | 0.012% to 0.06% | 0% to 0.045% | taker rates where a platform splits maker and taker |
| Highest multiplier | 1000x | 40x | 200x | 1000x | 500x | ceilings run from 40x to 1000x across the five |
| Costs to open $100 at 10x | $1.00 | $0.43 | $0.30 to $1.00 | $0.12 to $0.60 | $0.45 | one figure where a platform has one rate, two where the rate varies by class |
| Room to liquidation at 10x | 10.000% | 8.750% | 9.875% | not published | 8.500% | priced on bitcoin, the asset carrying the widest per-instrument record |
| Loss capped at | wager | isolated margin | collateral per trade | collateral per trade | collateral | a cap at the stake and a cap at the account are different objects |
| Carry rate published | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | 2 of 5; an unpublished rate enters no figure here |
| Practice mode | play money | not offered | unconfirmed | unconfirmed | unconfirmed | unconfirmed means no documented mode was found either way |
| Referral binds by | MARKET | NEWBONUS | link only | link only | link only | 2 bind by typed code, 3 bind by link |
| Referral benefit confirmed | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | confirmed against the platform's own documents on 3 of 5 |
Platform registry 2026-08-28a, reviewed through 2026-11-28. Every figure below is computed from each platform's own published terms.
the fee crossover sits at 23.1x taker and 69.4x maker
At 23.1x a $100 stake costs $1.00 on Moon and $1.00 on Hyperliquid, which is what a crossover means: below that leverage level the notional rate is the smaller number and above it the flat rate is. Rates on notional run from 0% to 0.1%, so the leverage level at which each of those 4 platforms overtakes a flat 1.0% differs by platform and by asset class.
room to liquidation comes from the maintenance rule, one platform at a time
Room is initial margin less whatever the platform keeps back, so the maintenance rule sets it and the multiplier alone never does. At 10x on bitcoin you get Moon 10.000%, Hyperliquid 8.750%, Ostium 9.875%, Avantis 8.500%, and 1 of 5 platforms publish a threshold table rather than a rule that can be evaluated at an arbitrary multiplier.
| Rung | Moon | Hyperliquid | Ostium | Avantis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2x | 50.000% | 48.750% | 49.875% | 42.500% |
| 3x | 33.333% | 32.083% | 33.208% | 28.333% |
| 5x | 20.000% | 18.750% | 19.875% | 17.000% |
| 10x | 10.000% | 8.750% | 9.875% | 8.500% |
| 20x | 5.000% | 3.750% | 4.875% | 4.250% |
| 25x | 4.000% | 2.750% | 3.875% | 3.400% |
| 40x | 2.500% | 1.250% | 2.375% | 2.125% |
| 50x | 2.000% | not listed ceiling 40x | 1.875% | 1.700% |
| 100x | 1.000% | not listed ceiling 40x | 0.875% | 0.850% |
| 200x | 0.500% | not listed ceiling 40x | 0.375% | 0.425% |
| 500x | 0.200% | not listed ceiling 40x | not listed ceiling 200x | 0.170% |
| 1000x | 0.100% | not listed ceiling 40x | not listed ceiling 200x | not listed ceiling 500x |
Room at each leverage level on bitcoin, computed per platform from its own maintenance rule. Gains Network (gTrade) publishes a threshold table rather than a rule, so it has no column here. A platform publishing a threshold table per class and multiplier has that table on its own review page instead.
cost of carry, stated per platform and never added up
| Platform | What it is called | Rate published | Terms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moon | rolling fee | No | every 8 hours, rate unpublished and excluded from every cost figure here |
| Hyperliquid | funding | Yes | every hour, capped at 4% per hour, interest component 0.00125% per hour |
| Ostium | rollover fee (non-crypto and crypto) | Yes | continuous per block |
| Gains Network (gTrade) | holding fees = funding fee + borrowing fee | No | funding accrues per second, borrowing accrues per block, both on total position size, rate unpublished and excluded from every cost figure here |
| Avantis | net rate (funding + borrow) | No | every hour, rate unpublished and excluded from every cost figure here |
2 of 5 platforms publish a rate or a cap for carry, so carry is not comparable across them. Every cost figure in this section is scoped to opening cost, which makes it a floor rather than an estimate.
what the 5 referral arrangements give
2 of the 5 platforms bind a referral with a typed code and 3 bind it with a link alone, which matters because a link that is not followed leaves nothing to type in later. Of the 5 arrangements, 3 state a benefit that the platform's own documents confirm, and the rest are unconfirmed claims. Each one is written out on its own page with the eligibility and the exclusions.
the promo code hub lists all 5 with what each gives.
Hyperliquid
notional fee basis, 40x ceiling, 0.045% to open, carry rate published.
the Hyperliquid reviewOstium
notional fee basis, 200x ceiling, 0.03% to 0.1% to open, carry rate published.
the Ostium reviewGains Network (gTrade)
notional fee basis, 1000x ceiling, 0.012% to 0.06% to open, carry rate unpublished.
the Gains Network (gTrade) reviewAvantis
notional fee basis, 500x ceiling, 0% to 0.045% to open, carry rate unpublished.
the Avantis reviewHead to head
Per leverage level cost, room on the 17 crypto markets both compared platforms list, and the survivable leverage level by holding period.
Moon against HyperliquidFigures on this page were rebuilt 2026-08-28 by the MarketMoves editorial desk, from the sources named in the methodology. Nothing here is a forecast, and none of it is advice.