Verdict
The opening fee is genuinely, structurally cheap, and Moon documents it
clearly enough to check. Three other costs are either unpublished or
undocumented, the licence is light-touch, and the product is still in beta.
Worth using at a size you would not mind losing, which is also the only size
the maths supports.
- Opening fee1% of the wager
- Max leverage1000×
- Loss capped atthe wager
- Rolling feeevery 8h, rate unpublished
- Asset classes5, no ticker list
- Statusopen beta
what it gets right
The fee structure. Charging 1% on the wager rather than a percentage of
notional is the single most consequential design choice in the product, and it is
the one that favours the customer. It is also documented in plain language, with a
worked example, in a glossary that goes out of its way to say the fee is
not charged on leveraged exposure. Venues do not usually volunteer the
sentence that closes off the more profitable reading.
Second, the loss cap. Moon says an account cannot go below zero from a bet.
Combined with liquidation at exactly one part in the leverage, the worst case is
knowable before you commit and it is the wager. That is a cleaner promise than a
margin account makes.
Third, 24/7 pricing on equities and indices. An oracle covers the hours the
underlying exchange is shut, which is either the best or the worst feature here
depending on your self-control.
what it does not tell you
The rolling fee rate. It is charged every 8 hours, Moon calls it dynamic,
and no number appears in the documentation. For a position held a day that is the
dominant unknown, and it is the reason nothing on this site quotes an overnight
cost.
Third-party testers also report a performance fee on realised profit and a
spread inside the settlement price. Neither appears in Moon's own documentation.
If both are real, the true round trip on a winning position is materially above
1%, and a reader who priced a trade off the glossary alone would be
surprised at settlement.
And the instrument list. Asset classes are published, tickers are not, so you
cannot confirm a market is available without opening an account.
the licence and the operator
Moon comes from Easygo, the company behind Stake.com, which means real
engineering and real scale behind the product. Third-party reviews place the
licence in Anjouan, which is a light-touch regime with limited practical recourse
compared with a UK, Malta or Australian licence. Nothing about that is hidden and
nothing about it is reassuring.
The platform is in open beta. Treat feature and pricing changes as likely
rather than possible, and re-read the terms before each deposit.
Operator: trade press. Licence and market
counts: third-party review, not corroborated by Moon's own
documentation.
who it suits
Someone who wants a defined-loss punt on a direction over hours rather than
weeks, who understands that 1000× means 0.100% of room, and who is sizing at
an amount whose total loss would be annoying rather than serious. The flat fee
makes small stakes viable in a way notional-based pricing does not.
who should stay away
Anyone who needs the position to survive overnight, because the dominant cost
over that horizon is the one number Moon will not publish. Anyone in the EU, the
UK or the US, where retail leverage of this kind is capped or not permitted.
Anyone who reads a 1000× button as an opportunity rather than as a
0.100% stop. And anyone who would need the money back.
what the downside is capped at
Moon states that a bet cannot take an account below zero, and that a position
closes once it has lost an amount equal to the wager. So the wager is the loss.
At 1000× that arrives after a 0.100% move, which is not a long wait, but it
arrives and then stops.
That is a genuine difference from a margin account, where an adverse gap can
leave a balance owing. It is also the reason the multiplier is survivable to write
about at all. The risk is not the size of the loss. It is the speed and the
certainty of it.
Loss capped at the wager: placing your first bet.
Liquidation at one part in the leverage: how leverage works.
Indicative example based on third-party market data. Moon's reference price, spread, fees, settlement and liquidation rules may produce a different result.
questions people actually ask
Is the 1% charged on my stake or on my leveraged position?
On the wager. Moon's glossary states the fee is calculated solely on the
wager amount and is not calculated on total leveraged exposure. A $100 wager
pays $1 at every rung from 2× to 1000×.
Can I lose more than I put in?
Moon says no. It states an account balance cannot go below zero as a result
of a bet, and closes a position once it has lost the wager.
What does 1000x liquidate at?
A 0.100% adverse move. Moon's own example uses Bitcoin at $60,000: a $100
wager at 1000× is gone by $59,940.
What does it cost to hold overnight?
Unknown from the documentation. A rolling fee applies every 8 hours at
a rate Moon describes as dynamic and does not publish.
Which markets can I bet on?
Moon lists cryptocurrency, equities, forex, commodities and futures. It
publishes no instrument list, so this site verifies availability per market by
hand and shows no link where nobody has checked.
Is Moon regulated?
Third-party reviews place the licence in Anjouan. That is a light-touch
regime. Moon's operator, Easygo, also runs Stake.com.
MarketMoves earns a commission when a reader opens an account through a link on this page. It costs the reader nothing and does not change the figures shown. That commission does not change what the tables say. The cost model on this page was rebuilt in August 2026 after a review found it overstated Moon's opening fee, and correcting it made Moon look cheaper, not dearer. See the affiliate disclosure and the methodology.